Gary Wright II - Gary-Wright.com

Gary-Wright.com ]  [ Activism ]    [ Wright v. Marshall County ]  → Court Docket

Wright v. Marshall County Alabama, et al.

Court Docket for Case # 4:22-cv-615


U.S. District Court
Northern District of Alabama (Middle Division)

Plaintiff:

Gary Wayne Wright, II

Defendants:

  1. Marshall County Alabama
  2. James Hutcheson - Marshall County Commission Chairman
  3. Ronny Shumate - Marshall County District 1 Commissioner
  4. Rick Watson - Marshall County District 2 Commissioner
  5. Lee Sims - Marshall County District 3 Commissioner
  6. Joey Baker - Marshall County District 4 Commissioner
  7. Clint Maze - Marshall County Commission Attorney
  8. Rhonda McCoy - Marshall County Commission Secretary
  9. Phil Sims - Marshall County Sheriff

  • Count 1: Violation of Free Speech
  • Count 2: Violation of Freedom of Assembly
  • Count 3: Violation of Ability to Redress Grievances
  • Count 4: Violation of Due Process
  • Count 5: Conspiracy to Deny Civil Rights

Date Filed #Docket Text
05/12/20221COMPLAINT against Joey Baker, James Hutcheson, Marshall County Alabama, Clint Maze, Rhonda McCoy, Ronny Shumate, Lee Sims, Phil Sims, Rick Watson, filed by Gary Wayne Wright, II.(AKD) (Entered: 05/13/2022)
05/13/2022 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis
Motion is RIPE 5/13/2022. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.
Filed by Gary Wayne Wright, II. (AKD) (Entered: 05/13/2022)
05/13/2022NOTICE for Electronic Noticing by Gary Wayne Wright, II (AKD) (Entered: 05/13/2022)
05/13/2022NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD) (Entered: 05/13/2022)
06/14/20225ORDER-Review of the complaint reveals the plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests in his prayer for relief a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief. (Doc. 1 at 87). This request brings the case outside the General Order and requires reassignment of the case to a district judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 06/14/2022. (AKD) (Entered: 06/14/2022)
06/14/20226NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT-The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Corey L. Maze. Please use case number 4:22 CV 615 CLM on all subsequent pleadings. (AKD) (Entered: 06/14/2022)
06/14/2022 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (see Doc. 1 at paragraph 87). (AKD) (Entered: 06/14/2022)
06/14/20228RECUSAL ORDER The court DIRECTS the Clerk to randomly reassign this case to another district judge in accordance with the Clerk's normal procedures. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 6/14/2022. (SRD) (Entered: 06/14/2022)
06/14/20229NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT - The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. Please use case number 4:22-cv-615-RDP on all subsequent pleadings. (KEK) (Entered: 06/14/2022)
06/15/202210ORDER Plaintiff has submitted an In Forma Pauperis Affidavit in which he seeks the appointment of an attorney and the authority to commence an action without prepayment of fees, costs, or security, The affidavit 2 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; the request to commence this action without prepayment of fees, costs, or security is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file this action without prepayment of a fee; Plaintiff's request for the appointment of an attorney is DENIED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 6/15/2022. (KAM) (Entered: 06/15/2022)
06/17/202211ORDER This matter is before the court upon the courts sua sponte review of Plaintiffs Complaint; That review reveals that Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests in his prayer for relief a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunctive relief. However, Plaintiffs complaint is not verified, and no separate motion has been filed with supporting affidavits; 7 Motion for TRO (within the complaint) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 6/17/2022. (KAM) (Entered: 06/17/2022)
07/01/202212Plaintiff's Response to Court Order Doc #11 (Entered: 07/01/2022)
08/11/202213Summons Issued as to Joey Baker, James Hutcheson, Marshall County Alabama, Clint Maze, Rhonda McCoy, Ronny Shumate, Lee Sims, Phil Sims, Rick Watson delivered to USM for service. (KAM) (Entered: 08/11/2022)
09/02/202214Defendant's Motion To Dismiss
09/02/202215Defendant's Brief on Motion To Dismiss
09/02/202216Defendant's Answer to Complaint
09/06/202217Initial Order
09/09/202218Order
09/27/202219Plaintiff Electronic Filing Request
09/27/202220Plaintiff Request for Counsel
09/27/202221Plaintiff Reply to Motion to Dismiss
09/27/202222Plaintiff Brief on 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985(3) Conspiracy
10/04/202223Order Denying Electronic Filing
10/06/202224Motion for 90 Day Extension
10/07/202225Order Granting 60 Day Extension
10/11/202226Defendants Reply to Motion to Dismiss
10/12/202227Plaintiff Motion for Extension
10/13/202228TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time. [27]. In light of the courts order on Defendants virtually identical Motion [25], the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Plaintiffs pending Motion. [27]
10/13/202229Order - Counsel Denied
11/21/202230Plaintiff Motion for Stay
12/2/202231Defendants Response
12/2/202231-1-AExhibit A
12/2/202231-2-BExhibit B
12/2/202231-3-CExhibit C
1/6/202332Order
1/6/202333Order
1/6/202334Order
1/X/202335TXT
2/23/202336Order
4/7/202337Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting
4/12/202338Order Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference
4/18/202339Defendant's Initial Disclosures
4/18/202339-1Exhibit A - Resolution
X/202340Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures
5/2/202341Scheduling Order
9/5/202342Consent Motion to file Amended Complaint
9/8/202343Order - Granting Amended Complaint filing
9/15/202344Amended Complaint
9/29/202345Answer
9/29/202346Defendant's Motion to Reconsider
9/29/202347Answer
10/2/202348Order - Conference
10/11/202349Order - Amended Complaint
10/24/202350Interrogatories by Defendants
11/15/202351Not Jury Triable
11/27/202352Interrogatories by Plaintiff
3/5/202453Responses to Plaintiffs Interrogatories
3/5/202454Motion for Summary Judgement
3/5/202455Evidentiary Submission
3/5/202455-1Exhibit A
3/5/202455-2Exhibit B
3/5/202455-3Exhibit C
3/5/202455-4Exhibit D
3/5/202455-5Exhibit E
3/5/202455-6Exhibit F
3/5/202455-7Exhibit G
3/5/202455-8Exhibit H
3/5/202455-9Exhibit I
3/5/202455-10Exhibit J
3/5/202455-11Exhibit K
3/5/202456Brief In Support of Motion for Summary Judgement
3/6/202457Electronic Noticing
3/6/202458Notice of Conventional Filing
3/14/202459Response to Motion for Summary Judgment
3/28/202460Reply

NOTE: The court docket on this page is a manual snapshot summary and is not updated in real-time. The live court docket can be found in PACER (but it costs per page to view). Another alternative (that is free) but not quite real-time is CourtListener.com


Last updated: Thursday, March 28th, 2024


Please Support Our Advertisers: